|
Kleine Einführung
ins aktuelle
Weltgeschehen
Wisse was IST,
dann weisst du,
was zu TUN ist
(jhr)
Kleine Einführung ins aktuelle Weltgeschehen
NACHDENK-SUITEN
Impulse 2016
Impulse 2015
Die 'WARUM'-Frage
Was uns so selten beantwortet wird
MAHNWACHE(N)
für den Frieden und die Freiheit - global
Fortsetzung Paradigmawechsel
Sei dabei - OCCUPY
Einleitung
Paradigmawechsel
Impulse 2014
DELPHINE & WALE
brauchen unsere Hilfe
DIE NEUEN KINDER
...
sind da ...
Impulse 2013
ANGST und ihre TRANSFORMATION
ESM-Vertrag -
Europa auf dem Weg in eine
Diktatur?
Impulse
2012
Ein Neubeginn
GRUND-EINKOMMEN
Bedingungsloses Grundeink. für ALLE
IMPFEN
Wem hilft's denn tatsächlich?
GRIPPE 09
-
sogenannte Schweine-Grippe
MMS
Miracle
Mineral
Supplement.
Ein "neues Antibiotikum?"
°
BORAX
CODEX ALIMENTARIUM
- (Anti-)Lebens-mittelcodex
CHEMTRAILS, HAARP, MINDCONTROL
die täglichen Manipulationen
OIL-KATASTROPHE
USA
im Golf von Mexiko
BIOMETRISCHER PASS
(CH)
Chip-Kontrolle unisono
ATOM-KATASTROPHE JAPAN
& GLOBAL die 'neuen'
Altlasten
UFO-DISCLOSURE
was uns kosmisch
vorenthalten wird
Fazit im schon fast 'legendären 2012'
eigene
Astrologieartikel
erschienen in der Zeitschrift Astrolog
1981-2003
aktuelle...
Sonne
Erdbeben
Vulkane
Übersicht 1
Übersicht 2
Warnungen-News
Aktuelle Ereignisse
| |
° Tonbandabschriften von Dr. Richard Day aus dem Jahre 1969
Overlords of Chaos
Unfortunately for the people of the world everything is going according to
the New World Order Plan. But what is this New World Order Plan? In a
nutshell the Plan is this. The Dark Agenda of the secret planners of the New
World Order is to reduce the world's population to a "sustainable" level "in
perpetual balance with nature" by a ruthless Population Control Agenda via
Population and Reproduction Control. A Mass Culling of the People via
Planned Parenthood, toxic adulteration of water and food supplies, release
of weaponised man-made viruses, man-made pandemics, mass vaccination
campaigns and a planned Third World War. Then, the Dark Agenda will impose
upon the drastically reduced world population a global feudal-fascist state
with a World Government, World Religion, World Army, World Central Bank,
World Currency and a micro-chipped population. In short, to kill 90% of the
world's population and to control all aspects of the human condition and
thus rule everyone, everywhere from the cradle to the grave.
Novus Ordo Seclorum: the New World Order
Tape 1
The New Order of Barbarians is the transcript of three tapes
of reminiscences made by Dr. Lawrence Dunegan, of a speech given on March
20, 1969 by Dr Richard Day, an insider of the "Order," recorded by Randy
Engel in 1988. Dr Dunegan claims he attended a medical meeting on March 20,
1969 where Dr Richard Day (who died in 1989 but at the time was Professor of
Paediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York and was previously the
Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America) give "off the
record" remarks during an addressed at the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society to a
meeting of students and health professionals, who were destined to be
leaders in medicine and health care. In tape three, recorded by Randy Engel,
Dunegan details Dr Day's credentials and what is clear from this is that Day
was an Establishment insider privy to the overarching plan of an Elite Group
that rules the Western world, as well as having a massive influence across
the rest of the globe, for the creation of a World Dictatorship. This Global
Tyranny is usually called the New World Order which contains a secular and a
spiritual component: the One World Government and the One World Religion.
Before he began his talk, Dr. Day asked everyone to turn off all tape
recorders and stop note taking so that he could tell them, the prospective
leaders of organised medicine, what was going to happen in the future. Dr.
Dunegan sensed Dr. Day's message was important, disobeyed the request and
recorded what was said as notes on napkins, later writing up these notes,
which were the basis of the interview with Engel, the National Director of
the US Coalition for Life. The notes taken by Dunegan reveal not just what
is planned for the entire world's people but also how this evil cabal intend
to carry out this plan. For, those who understand such things will recognise
that Day's remarks are merely reiteration of the secret agenda of the Global
Elite to wipe out swathes of humanity by promoting ill health and spurious
medical treatments while suppressing effective treatments for diseases as
well as the deliberate introduction of man-made pathogens, like AIDS, into
the human gene pool.
Throughout is talk Day justifies his observations by using a philosophy
founded upon a spurious theory made famous by the English natural scientist
Charles Darwin (1809-82) vis-à-vis evolution by "natural selection." That is,
a posited natural process resulting in the evolution of organisms best
adapted to the environment pithily described by an ardent supporter of it,
the English philosopher and sociologist Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), as the
"survival of the fittest," who then promptly applied the theory to human
societies. And while Darwin restricted his formula of organic evolution (wherein
new species arise and are perpetuated by natural selection) to the animal
kingdom others followed Spenser and extended it to human society. This
theory, often called Social Darwinism (whereby human society mimics the
jungle and only those best able to cope with the many testing dangers
survive and perpetuate their characteristics into future generations and so
ever increase the degree of separation of human society from the degenerate)
is the scientific basis of eugenics and everything it connotes.
The German philosopher Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844-1900) best
remembered for his concept of the "superman" and for his rejection of
Christian values is one of the philosophical giants of this movement. Dr
Day, an ardent atheist, was thus a spokesman for those who view human
existence as merely an extension of the jungle and whose self-appointed task
is to safeguard what advances have been made by humans, epitomised by
Western Christian Civilisation, by rooting out "weakness" and "degeneracy"
from the human gene pool. Moreover, in so doing, not only preserve what
advances humanity has made in this evolutionary process but also to "help"
it along. It is this pernicious philosophy, wholly inimical to the true
purpose of Creation wrought by the Will of God, and of the Natural Moral
Order therein, which lies barely concealed in much of the wicked works of
those who strive to build their New World Order. It is also part of the
reason why a major component of the plan for the New World Order is not only
eugenics but also Population Reduction and genocide. Moreover, it is the
reason why people like Dr Day hate Christianity, which in its truest form
concretises Natural Moral Order, and seeks its destruction here on Earth as
a spiritual reality.
Although Day knew and spoke of the secret agenda within organised medicine
to cull the world's population, he was also privy to the wider goals of the
conspirators working to bring about World Dictatorship under their direct
control. In his introductory remarks, Dr. Richard Day commented that he was
free to speak at this time (1969) since, even a few years earlier, he would
not have been able to say what he was about to say. However, he was now free
to speak at this time because the ancient ambition of the secret societies,
the closely guarded "Closed Conspiracy" was now an "Open Conspiracy" because
as Day crowed:
"... everything is in place and nobody can stop us now."
Amongst the hitherto Secret Plans Day outlined were the morals revolution
that had shook Western society to its foundations and the ushering onto the
world's stage a New World Religion, the One World Religion of the New World
Order, which would be brought about by the churches themselves, especially
the Roman Catholic Church. Moreover, he discussed "bringing the nation to
the brink of nuclear war" and the cynical control and use of "terrorism" to
bring about World Government and the New World Order. Topics Day discusses
are:
"Population control; permission to have babies; redirecting the purpose of
sex - sex without reproduction and reproduction without sex; contraception
universally available to all; sex education and carnalising of youth as a
tool of world government; tax funded abortion as population control;
encouraging homosexuality ... anything goes homosexuality also was to be
encouraged; technology used for reproduction without sex; families to
diminish in importance; euthanasia and the "demise pill"; limiting access to
affordable medical care makes eliminating elderly easier; medicine would be
tightly controlled; elimination of private doctors; new difficult to
diagnose and untreatable diseases; suppressing cancer cures as a means of
population control; inducing heart attacks as a form of assassination;
education as a tool for accelerating the onset of puberty and evolution;
blending all religions ... the old religions will have to go; changing the
bible through revisions of key words; restructuring education as a tool of
indoctrination; more time in schools, but pupils "wouldn't learn anything";
controlling who has access to information; schools as the hub of the
community; "some books would just disappear from the libraries"; changing
laws to promote moral and social chaos; the encouragement of drug abuse to
create a jungle atmosphere in cities and towns; promote alcohol abuse;
restrictions on travel; the need for more jails, and using hospitals as
jails; no more psychological or physical security; crime used to manage
society; curtailment of US industrial pre-eminence; shifting populations and
economies -- tearing out the social roots; sports as a tool of social
engineering and change; sex and violence inculcated through entertainment;
travel restrictions and implanted I.D. cards; food control; weather control;
know how people respond - making them do what you want; falsified scientific
research; use of terrorism; surveillance, implants, and televisions that
watch you; home ownership a thing of the past; the arrival of the
totalitarian global system."
Tape One
Is there a Power, a Force or a Group of Men Organizing and Redirecting
Change?
There has been much written, and much said, by some people who have looked
at all the changes that have occurred in American society in the past 20
years or so, and who have looked retrospectively to earlier history of the
United States, and indeed, of the world, and come to the conclusion that
there is a conspiracy of sorts which influences, indeed controls, major
historical events, not only in the United States, but around the world. This
conspiratorial interpretation of history is based on people making
observations from the outside, gathering evidence and coming to the
conclusion that from the outside they see a conspiracy. Their evidence and
conclusions are based on evidence gathered in retrospect. Period.
I want to now describe what I heard from a speaker in 1969 which in several
weeks will be 20 years ago. The speaker did not speak in terms of retrospect,
but rather predicting changes that would be brought about in the future. The
speaker was not looking from the outside in, thinking that he saw conspiracy,
rather, he was on the inside, admitting that, indeed, there was an organized
power, force, group of men, who wielded enough influence to determine major
events involving countries around the world. And he predicted, or rather
expounded on, changes that were planned for the remainder of this century.
As you listen, if you can recall the situation, at least in the United
States in 1969 and the few years thereafter, and then recall the kinds of
changes which have occurred between then and now, almost 20 years later, I
believe you will be impressed with the degree to which the things that were
planned to be brought about have already been accomplished. Some of the
things that were discussed were not intended to be accomplished yet by 1988
but are intended to be accomplished before the end of this century. There is
a timetable; and it was during this session that some of the elements of the
timetable were brought out.
Anyone who recalls early in the days of the Kennedy Presidency. . the
Kennedy campaign. . when he spoke of "progress in the decade of the '60s";
that was kind of a cliché in those days - "the decade of the '60s." Well, by
1969 our speaker was talking about the decade of the '70s, the decade of the
'80s, and the decade of the '90s. So that... I think that terminology that
we are looking at. . . looking at things and expressing things, probably all
comes from the same source. Prior to that time I don't remember anybody
saying "the decade of the '40s and the decade of the '50s. So I think this
overall plan and timetable had taken important shape with more
predictability to those who control it, sometime in the late '50s. That's
speculation on my part. In any event, the speaker said that his purpose was
to tell us about changes which would be brought about in the next 30 years
or so . . . so that an entirely new world-wide system would be in operation
before the turn of the century. As he put it:
"We plan to enter the 21st Century with a running start. Everything is in
place and nobody can stop us now . . ."
He said – as we listened to what he was about to present – he said:
"Some of you will think I'm talking about Communism. Well, what I'm talking
about is much bigger than Communism!"
At that time he indicated that there is much more cooperation between East
and West than most people realize. In his introductory remarks he commented
that he was free to speak at this time because now, and I'm quoting here:
" ... everything is in place and nobody can stop us now."
That's the end of that quotation. He went on to say that most people don't
understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in
governments, including our own, don't really understand how and where
decisions are made. He went on to say that... he went on to say that people
who really influence decisions are names that, for the most part, would be
familiar to most of us, but he would not use individuals' names or names of
any specific organization. But, that if he did, most of the people would be
names that were recognized by most of his audience. He went on to say that
they were not primarily people in public office, but people of prominence
who were primarily known in their private occupations or private positions.
The speaker was a doctor of medicine, a former professor at a large Eastern
university, and he was addressing a group of doctors of medicine, about 80
in number. His name would not be widely recognized by anybody likely to hear
this, and so there is no point in giving his name. The only purpose in
recording this is that it may give a perspective to those who hear it
regarding the changes which have already been accomplished in the past 20
years or so, and a bit of a preview to what at least some people are
planning for the remainder of this century so that we – or they – would
enter the 21st Century with a flying start. Some of us may not enter that
Century. His purpose in telling our group about these changes that were to
be brought about was to make it easier for us to adapt to these changes.
Indeed, as he quite accurately said, they would be and he hopes that we, as
sort of his friends, would make the adaptation more easily if we knew
somewhat beforehand what to expect.
"People will have to get used to change . . ."
Somewhere in the introductory remarks he insisted that nobody have a tape
recorder and that nobody take notes, which for a professor was a very
remarkable kind of thing to expect from an audience. Something in his
remarks suggested that there could be negative repercussions against him if
his... if it became widely known what he was about to say to... our group...
if it became widely known that he spilled the beans, so to speak. When I
heard that, first I thought maybe that was sort of an ego trip, somebody
enhancing his own importance. But as the revelations unfolded, I began to
understand why he might have had some concern about not having it widely
known what was said, although this... although this was a fairly public
forum where he was speaking, [where the] remarks were delivered. But,
nonetheless, he asked that no notes be taken... no tape recording be used –
suggesting there might be some personal danger to himself if these
revelations were widely publicized. Again, as the remarks began to unfold,
and I saw the rather outrageous things that were said – at that time they
certainly seemed outrageous -- I made it a point to try to remember as much
of what he said as I could, and during the subsequent weeks and months and
years, to connect my recollections to simple events around me, both to aid
my memory for the future in case I wanted to do what I'm doing now - record
this. And also, to try to maintain a perspective on what would be developing,
if indeed, it followed the predicted pattern - which it has!
At this point, so that I don't forget to include it later, I'll just include
some statements that were made from time to time throughout the presentation...
just having a general bearing on the whole presentation. One of the
statements was having to do with change. People get used … his statement
was:
"People will have to get used to the idea of change, so used to change, that
they'll be expecting change. Nothing will be permanent."
This often came out in the context of a society of... where people seemed to
have no roots or moorings, but would be passively willing to accept change
simply because it was all they had ever known. This was sort of in contrast
to generations of people up until this time where certain things you
expected to be, and remain in place as reference points for your life. So
change was to be brought about, change was to be anticipated and expected,
and accepted, no questions asked. Another comment that was made from time to
time during the presentation was:
"People are too trusting. People don't ask the right questions."
Sometimes, being too trusting was equated with being too dumb. But sometimes
when ... when he would say that and say, "People don't ask the right
questions," it was almost with a sense of regret, as if he were uneasy with
what he was part of, and wished that people would challenge it and maybe not
be so trusting.
The Real and the "Stated" Goals
Another comment that was repeated from time to time ... this particularly in
relation to changing laws and customs ... and specific changes ... he said:
"Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make
it acceptable to people; and second, is the real purpose which would further
the goals of establishing the new system and having it."
Frequently he would say:
"There is just no other way. There's just no other way!"
This seemed to come as a sort of an apology, particularly when ... at the
conclusion of describing some particularly offensive changes. For example,
the promotion of drug addiction which we'll get into shortly.
Population Control
He was very active with population control groups, the population control
movement, and population control was really the entry point into specifics
following the introduction. He said the population is growing too fast.
Numbers of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we
will run out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and we will
over-pollute the world with our waste.
Permission to Have Babies
People won't be allowed to have babies just because they want to or because
they are careless. Most families would be limited to two. Some people would
be allowed only one, and the outstanding person or persons might be selected
and allowed to have three. But most people would [be] allowed to have only
two babies. That's because the zero population growth [rate] is 2.1 children
per completed family. So something like every 10th family might be allowed
the privilege of the third baby. To me, up to this point, the word "population
control" primarily connoted limiting the number of babies to be born. But
this remark, about what people would be "allowed" and then what followed,
made it quite clear that when you hear "population control" that means more
than just controlling births. It means control of every endeavor of an
entire... of the entire world population; a much broader meaning to that
term than I had ever attached to it before hearing this. As you listen and
reflect back on some of the things you hear, you will begin to recognize how
one aspect dovetails with other aspects in terms of controlling human
endeavors.
Redirecting the Purpose of Sex: Sex without Reproduction and Reproduction
without Sex
Well, from population control, the natural next step then was sex. He said
sex must be separated from reproduction. Sex is too pleasurable, and the
urges are too strong, to expect people to give it up. Chemicals in food and
in the water supply to reduce the sex drive is not practical. The strategy
then would be not to diminish sex activity, but to increase sex activity,
but in such a way that people won't be having babies.
Contraception Universally available to All
And the first consideration then here was contraception. Contraception would
be very strongly encouraged, and it would be connected so closely in
people's minds with sex, that they would automatically think contraception
when they were thinking or preparing for sex. And contraception would be
made universally available. Nobody wanting contraception would be... find
that they were unavailable. Contraceptives would be displayed much more
prominently in drug stores, right up with the cigarettes and chewing gum.
Out in the open, rather than hidden under the counter where people would
have to ask for them and maybe be embarrassed. This kind of openness was a
way of suggesting that contraceptions … that contraceptives are just as much
a part of life as any other items sold in the store. And, contraceptives
would be advertised. And, contraceptives would be dispensed in the schools
in association with sex education!
Sex Education as a Tool of World Government
The sex education was to get kids interested early, making the connection
between sex and the need for contraception early in their lives, even before
they became very active. At this point I was recalling some of my teachers,
particularly in high school and found it totally unbelievable to think of
them agreeing, much less participating in, distributing of contraceptives to
students. But, that only reflected my lack of understanding of how these
people operate. That was before the school-based clinic programs got started.
Many, many cities in the United States by this time have already set up
school-based clinics which are primarily contraception, birth control,
population control clinics. The idea then is that the connection between sex
and contraception introduced and reinforced in school would carry over into
marriage. Indeed, if young people – when they matured – decided to get
married, marriage itself would be diminished in importance. He indicated
some recognition that most people probably would want to be married ... but
that this certainly would not be any longer considered to be necessary for
sexual activity.
Tax Funded Abortion as Population Control
No surprise then, that the next item was abortion. And this, now back in
1969, four years before Roe vs. Wade. He said:
"Abortion will no longer be a crime. Abortion will be accepted as normal"
… and would be paid for by taxes for people who could not pay for their own
abortions. Contraceptives would be made available by tax money so that
nobody would have to do without contraceptives. If school sex programs would
lead to more pregnancies in children that was really seen as no problem.
Parents who think they are opposed to abortion on moral or religious grounds
will change their minds when it is their own child who is pregnant. So this
will help overcome opposition to abortion. Before long, only a few die-hards
will still refuse to see abortion as acceptable, and they won't matter
anymore.
Encouraging Homosexuality. Sex, Anything Goes
Homosexuality also was to be encouraged.
"People will be given permission to be homosexual."
That's the way it was stated. They won't have to hide it. And elderly people
will be encouraged to continue to have active sex lives into the very old
ages, just as long as they can. Everyone will be given permission to have
sex, to enjoy however they want. Anything goes. This is the way it was put.
And, I remember thinking, "how arrogant for this individual, or whoever he
represents, to feel that they can give or withhold permission for people to
do things!" But that was the terminology that was used. In this regard,
clothing was mentioned. Clothing styles would be made more stimulating and
provocative. Recall back in 1969 was the time of the mini skirt, when those
mini- skirts were very, very high and revealing. He said:
"It is not just the amount of skin that is exposed that makes clothing
sexually seductive, but other, more subtle things are often suggestive,"
… things like movement, and the cut of clothing, and the kind of fabric, the
positioning of accessories on the clothing.
"If a woman has an attractive body, why should she not show it?"
… was one of the statements.
There was not detail on what was meant by "provocative clothing," but since
that time if you watched the change in clothing styles, blue jeans are cut
in a way that they're more tight-fitting in the crotch. They form wrinkles.
Wrinkles are essentially arrows. Lines which direct one's vision to certain
anatomic areas. And, this was around the time of the "burn your bra"
activity. He indicated that a lot of women should not go without a bra. They
need a bra to be attractive, so instead of banning bras and burning them,
bras would come back. But they would be thinner and softer allowing more
natural movement. It was not specifically stated, but certainly a very thin
bra is much more revealing of the nipple and what else is underneath, than
the heavier bras that were in style up to that time.
Technology. Earlier he said … sex and reproduction would be separated. You
would have sex without reproduction and then technology was reproduction
without sex. This would be done in the laboratory. He indicated that already,
much, much research was underway about making babies in the laboratory.
There was some elaboration on that, but I don't remember the details, how
much of that technology has come to my attention since that time. I don't
remember … I don't remember in a way that I can distinguish what was said
from what I subsequently have learned as general medical information.
Families to Diminish in Importance
Families would be limited in size. We already alluded to not being allowed
more than two children. Divorce would be made easier and more prevalent.
Most people who marry will marry more than once. More people will not marry.
Unmarried people would stay in hotels and even live together. That would be
very common - nobody would even ask questions about it. It would be widely
accepted as no different from married people being together. More women will
work outside the home. More men will be transferred to other cities, and in
their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for
families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship
less stable and, therefore, tend to make people less willing to have babies.
And, the extended families would be smaller, and more remote. Travel would
be easier, less expensive, for a while, so that people who did have to
travel would feel they could get back to their families... not that they
were abruptly being made remote from their families. But one of the net
effects of easier divorce laws combined with the promotion of travel, and
transferring families from one city to another, was to create instability in
the families. If both husband and wife are working and one partner gets
transferred the other one may not be easily transferred. So one either keeps
his or her job and stays behind while the other leaves, or else gives up the
job and risks not finding employment in the new location. Rather a
diabolical approach to this whole thing!
Euthanasia and the "Demise Pill"
Everybody has a right to live only so long. The old are no longer useful.
They become a burden. You should be ready to accept death. Most people are.
An arbitrary age limit could be established. After all, you have a right to
only so many steak dinners, so many orgasms, and so many good pleasures in
life. And after you have had enough of them and you're no longer productive,
working, and contributing, then you should be ready to step aside for the
next generation. Some things that would help people realize that they had
lived long enough; he mentioned several of these... I don't remember them
all... here are a few: Use of very pale printing ink on forms that people...
are necessary... to fill out, so that older people wouldn't be able to read
the pale ink as easily and would need to go to younger people for help.
Automobile traffic patterns - there would be more high-speed traffic lanes.
. traffic patterns that would ... that older people with their slower
reflexes would have trouble dealing with and thus, lose some of their
independence.
Limiting access to affordable Medical Care makes Eliminating the Elderly
Easier
A big item – [that] was elaborated at some length – was the cost of medical
care would be burdensomely high. Medical care would be connected very
closely with one's work, but also would be made very, very high in cost so
that it would simply be unavailable to people beyond a certain time. And
unless they had a remarkably rich, supporting family, they would just have
to do without care. And the idea was that if everybody says:
"Enough! What a burden it is on the young to try to maintain the old people
… then the young would become agreeable to helping Mom and Dad along the
way, provided this was done humanely and with dignity. And then the real
example was - there could be like a nice, farewell party, a real celebration.
Mom and Dad had done a good job. And then after the party's over they take
the "demise pill."
Planning the Control over Medicine
The next topic is Medicine. There would be profound changes in the practice
of medicine. Overall, medicine would be much more tightly controlled. The
observation was made:
"Congress is not going to go along with national health insurance. That [in
1969, he said] is now, abundantly evident. But it's not necessary. We have
other ways to control health care."
These would come about more gradually, but all health care delivery would
come under tight control. Medical care would be closely connected to work.
If you don't work or can't work, you won't have access to medical care. The
days of hospitals giving away free care would gradually wind down, to where
it was virtually non-existent. Costs would be forced up so that people won't
be able to afford to go without insurance. People pay... you pay for it,
you're entitled to it. It was only subsequently that I began to realize the
extent to which you would not be paying for it. Your medical care would be
paid for by others. And therefore you would gratefully accept, on bended
knee, what was offered to you as a privilege. Your role being responsible
for your own care would be diminished. As an aside here – this is not
something that was developed at this time ... I didn't understand it at the
time -as an aside, the way this works, everybody's made dependent on
insurance. And if you don't have insurance then you pay directly; the cost
of your care is enormous. The insurance company, however, paying for your
care, does not pay that same amount. If you are charged, say, $600 on your
part, they pay $300 or $400. And that differential in billing has the
desired effect: It enables the insurance company to pay for that which you
could never pay for. They get a discount that's unavailable to you. When you
see your bill you're grateful that the insurance company could do that. And
in this way you are dependent, and virtually required to have insurance.
The whole billing is Fraudulent
Anyhow, continuing on now... access to hospitals would be tightly controlled.
Identification would be needed to get into the building. The security in and
around hospitals would be established and gradually increased so that nobody
without identification could get in or move around inside the building.
Theft of hospital equipment, things like typewriters and microscopes and so
forth would be "allowed" and exaggerated; reports of it would be exaggerated
so that this would be the excuse needed to establish the need for strict
security, until people got used to it. And anybody moving about in a
hospital would be required to wear an identification badge with photograph
and … telling why he was there … employee or lab technician or visitor or
whatever. This is to be brought in gradually - getting everybody used to the
idea of identifying themselves- until it was just accepted. This need for ID
to move about would start in small ways: hospitals, some businesses, but
gradually expand to include everybody in all places! It was observed that
hospitals can be used to confine people ... for the treatment of criminals.
This did not mean, necessarily, medical treatment. At that ... at that time,
I did not know the word "Psycho-Prison" as in the Soviet Union, but without
trying to recall all the details, basically, he was describing the use of
hospitals both for treating the sick and for confinement of criminals for
reasons other than the medical well-being of the criminal. The definition of
criminal was not given.
Elimination of Private Doctors
The image of the doctor would change. No longer would he be seen as an
individual professional in service to individual patients. But the doctor
would be gradually recognized as a highly skilled technician ... and his job
would change. The job is to include things like executions by lethal
injection. The image of the doctor being a powerful, independent person
would have to be changed. And he went on to say:
"Doctors are making entirely too much money. They should advertise like any
other product."
Lawyers would be advertising too. Keep in mind; this was an audience of
doctors being addressed by a doctor. And it was interesting that he would
make some rather insulting statements to his audience without fear of
antagonizing us. The solo practitioner would become a thing of the past. A
few die-hards might try to hold out, but most doctors would be employed by
an institution of one kind or another. Group practice
would be encouraged, corporations would be encouraged, and then once the
corporate image of medical care ... as this gradually became more and more
acceptable, doctors would more and more become employees rather than
independent contractors. And along with that, of course, unstated but
necessary, is the employee serves his employer, not his patient. So that's
... we've already seen quite a lot of that in the last 20 years. And
apparently more on the horizon. The term HMO was not used at that time, but
as you look at HMOs you see this is the way that medical care is being taken
over since the National Health Insurance approach did not get through the
Congress. A few die-hard doctors may try to make a go of it; remaining in
solo practice, remaining independent, which, parenthetically, is me. But
they would suffer a great loss of income. They'd be able to scrape by, maybe,
but never really live comfortably as would those who were willing to become
employees of the system. Ultimately, there would be no room at all for the
solo practitioner, after the system is entrenched.
New Difficult to Diagnose and Untreatable Diseases
Next heading to talk about is Health & Disease. He said there would be new
diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before. Would be very
difficult to diagnose and be untreatable- at least for a long time. No
elaboration was made on this, but I remember, not long after hearing this
presentation, when I had a puzzling diagnosis to make, I would be wondering,
"Is this ... was what he was talking about? Is this a case of what he was
talking about?" Some years later, as AIDS ultimately developed, I think AIDS
was at least one example of what he was talking about. I now think that AIDS
probably was a manufactured disease.
Suppressing Cancer Cures as a Means of Population Control
He said:
"We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the
Rockefeller Institute, if it's ever decided that it should be released. But
consider - if people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become
overpopulated. You may as well die of cancer as something else."
Efforts at cancer treatment would be geared more toward comfort than toward
cure. There was some statement ultimately the cancer cures which were being
hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because independent
researchers might bring them out, despite these efforts to suppress them.
But at least for the time being, letting people die of cancer was a good
thing to do because it would slow down the problem of overpopulation.
Inducing Heart Attacks as a Form of Assassination
Another very interesting thing was heart attacks. He said:
"There is now a way to simulate a real heart attack. It can be used as a
means of assassinates."
Only a very skilled pathologist, who knew exactly what to look for at an
autopsy, could distinguish this from the real thing. I thought that was a
very surprising and shocking thing to hear from this particular man at that
particular time. This, and the business of the cancer cure, really still
stand out sharply in my memory, because they were so shocking and, at that
time, seemed to me out of character. He then went on to talk about nutrition
and exercise, sort of in the same framework. People would not have to ...
people would have to eat right and exercise right to live as long as before.
Most won't. This, in the connection of nutrition, there was no specific
statement that I can recall as to particular nutrients that would be either
inadequate or in excess. In retrospect, I tend to think he meant high salt
diets and high fat diets would predispose toward high blood pressure and
premature arteriosclerotic heart disease. And that if people who were too
dumb or too lazy to exercise as they should then their dietary... their
circulating fats go up and predispose to disease.
And he said something about diet information -about proper diet- would be
widely available, but most people -particularly stupid people, who had no
right to continue living anyway- they would ignore the advice and just go on
and eat what was convenient and tasted good. There were some other
unpleasant things said about food. I just can't recall what they were. But I
do remember of ... having reflections about wanting to plant a garden in the
backyard to get around whatever these contaminated foods would be. I regret
I don't remember the details ... the rest of this ... about nutrition and
hazardous nutrition.
With regard to Exercise. He went on to say that more people would be
exercising more, especially running, because everybody can run. You don't
need any special equipment or place. You can run wherever you are. As he put
it, "people will be running all over the place." And in this vein, he
pointed out how supply produces demand. And this was in reference to
athletic clothing and equipment. As this would be made more widely available
and glamorized, particularly as regards running shoes, this would stimulate
people to develop an interest in running and- as part of a whole sort of
public propaganda campaign- people would be encouraged then to buy the
attractive sports equipment and to get into exercise.
Again... well in connection with nutrition he also mentioned that public
eating places would rapidly increase. That ... this had a connection with
the family too. As more and more people eat out, eating at home would become
less important. People would be less dependent on their kitchens at home.
And then this also connected to convenience foods being made widely
available -things like you could pop into the microwave. Whole meals would
be available pre-fixed. And of course, we've now seen this ... and some
pretty good ones. But this whole different approach to eating out and to
previously prepared meals being eaten in the home was predicted at that time
to be brought about -convenience foods. The convenience foods would be part
of the hazards. Anybody who was lazy enough to want the convenience foods
rather than fixing his own also had better be energetic enough to exercise.
Because if he was too lazy to exercise and too lazy to fix his own food,
then he didn't deserve to live very long.
This was all presented as sort of a moral judgment about people and what
they should do with their energies. People who are smart, who would learn
about nutrition, and who are disciplined enough to eat right and exercise
right are better people -and the kind you want to live longer.
Education as a Tool for Accelerating the onset of Puberty and Evolution
Somewhere along in here there was also something about accelerating the
onset of puberty. And this was said in connection with health, and later in
connection with education, and connecting to accelerating the process of
evolutionary change. There was a statement that:
" ... we think that we can push evolution faster and in the direction we
want it to go."
I remember this only as a general statement. I don't recall if any details
were given beyond that.
Blending all Religions …. The Old Religions will have to Go
Another area of discussion was Religion. This is an avowed atheist speaking.
And he said:
"Religion is not necessarily bad. A lot of people seem to need religion,
with it's mysteries and rituals – so they will have religion."
But the major religions of today have to be changed because they are not
compatible with the changes to come. The old religions will have to go.
Especially Christianity. Once the Roman Catholic Church is brought down, the
rest of Christianity will follow easily. Then a new religion can be accepted
for use all over the world. It will incorporate something from all of the
old ones to make it more easy for people to accept it, and feel at home in
it. Most people won't be too concerned with religion. They will realize that
they don't need it.
Changing the Bible through Revisions of Key Words
In order to do this, the Bible will be changed. It will be rewritten to fit
the new religion. Gradually, key words will be replaced with new words
having various shades of meaning. Then, the meaning attached to the new word
can be close to the old word. And as time goes on, other shades of meaning
of that word can be emphasized, and then gradually that word replaced with
another word. I don't know if I'm making that clear. But the idea is that
everything in Scripture need not be rewritten, just key words replaced by
other words. And the variability in meaning attached to any word can be used
as a tool to change the entire meaning of Scripture, and therefore make it
acceptable to this new religion. Most people won't know the difference; and
this was another one of the times where he said:
"... the few who do notice the difference won't be enough to matter."
The Churches will Help
Then followed one of the most surprising statements of the whole
presentation: He said:
" ... some of you probably think the churches won't stand for this [and he
went on to say] The churches will help us!"
There was no elaboration on this; it was unclear just what he had in mind
when he said, "the churches will help us!" In retrospect, I think some of us
now can understand what he might have meant at that time. I recall then only
of thinking, "no they won't!" and remembering our Lord's words where he said
to Peter, "Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church, and
gates of Hell will not prevail against it." So ... yes, some people in the
churches might help. And in the subsequent 20 years we've seen how some
people in churches have helped. But we also know that our Lord's Words will
stand, and the gates of Hell will not prevail.
Restructuring Education as a Tool of Indoctrination
Another area of discussion was Education. And one of the things in
connection with education that I remember connecting with what he said about
religion was – in addition to changing the Bible – he said that the classics
in Literature would be changed. I seem to recall Mark Twain's writings was
given as one example. But he said, the casual reader reading a revised
version of a classic would never even suspect that there was any change.
And, somebody would have to go through word by word to even recognize that
any change was made in these classics; the changes would be so subtle. But
the changes would be such as to promote the acceptability of the new system.
More Time in Schools, but they "Wouldn't Learn Anything."
As regards education, he indicated that kids would spend more time in
schools, but in many schools they wouldn't learn anything. They'll learn
some things, but not as much as formerly. Better schools in better areas
with better people -their kids will learn more. In the better schools,
learning would be accelerated. And this is another time where he said:
"We think we can push evolution."
By pushing kids to learn more, he seemed to be suggesting that their brains
would evolve, that their offspring would evolve -sort of pushing evolution-
where kids would learn and be more intelligent at a younger age. As if this
pushing would alter their physiology. Overall, schooling would be prolonged.
This meant prolonged through the school year. I'm not sure what he said
about a long school day, I do remember he said that school was planned to go
all summer, that the summer school vacation would become a thing of the past.
Not only for schools, but for other reasons. People would begin to think of
vacation times year round, not just in the summer. For most people, it would
take longer to complete their education. To get what originally had been in
a bachelor's program would now require advanced degrees and more schooling.
So that a lot of school time would be just wasted time. Good schools would
become more competitive. I inferred when he said that that he was including
all schools -elementary up through college- but I don't recall whether he
said that. Students would have to decide at a younger age what they would
want to study and get onto their track early, if they would qualify. It
would be harder to change to another field of study once you get started.
Studies would be concentrated in much greater depth, but narrowed. You
wouldn't have access to material in other fields, outside your own area of
study, without approval. This seem to be more ... where he talked about
limited access to other fields ... I seem to recall that as being more at
the college level, high school and college level, perhaps. People would be
very specialized in their own area of expertise. But they won't be able to
get a broad education and won't be able to understand what is going on
overall.
Controlling who has Access to Information
He was already talking about computers in education, and at that time he
said anybody who wanted computer access, or access to books that were not
directly related to their field of study would have to have a very good
reason for so doing. Otherwise, access would be denied.
Schools as the Hub of the Community
Another angle was that the schools would become more important in people's
overall life. Kids in addition to their academics, would have to get into
school activities unless they wanted to feel completely out of it. But
spontaneous activities among kids -the thing that came to my mind when I
heard this was sandlot football and sandlot baseball teams that we worked up
as kids growing up. I said the kids wanting any activities outside of school
would be almost forced to get them through the school. There would be few
opportunities outside.
Now the pressures of the accelerated academic program, the accelerated
demands, where kids would feel they had to be part of something – one or
another athletic club or some school activity -these pressures he recognized
would cause some students to burn out. He said:
" ... the smartest ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive.
There will be some help available to students in handling stress, but the
unfit won't be able to make it. They will then move on to other things."
In this connection, and later on in the connection with drug abuse and
alcohol abuse, he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be
increased dramatically. In all the pushing for achievement, it was
recognized that many people would need help, and the people worth keeping
around would be able to accept and benefit from that help, and still be
super-achievers. Those who could not would fall by the wayside and therefore
were sort of dispensable -"expendable" -I guess is the word I want.
Education would be lifelong. Adults would be going to school. There'll
always be new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can't
keep up anymore, you're too old. This was another way of letting older
people know that the time had come for them to move on and take the demise
pill. If you get too tired to keep up with your education, or you got too
old to learn new information, then this was a signal – you begin to prepare
to get ready to step aside.
Some Books would just Disappear from the Libraries
In addition to revising the classics, which I alluded to awhile ago -with
revising the Bible, he said:
"... some books would just disappear from the libraries."
This was in the vein that some books contain information or contain ideas
that should not be kept around. And therefore, those books would disappear.
I don't remember exactly if he said how this was to be accomplished. But I
seem to recall carrying away this idea that this would include thefts. That
certain people would be designated to go to certain libraries and pick up
certain books and just get rid of them. Not necessarily as a matter of
policy – just simply steal it. Further down the line, not everybody will be
allowed to own books. And some books nobody will be allowed to own.
Changing Laws
Another area of discussion was laws that would be changed. At that time a
lot of States had blue laws about Sunday sales, certain Sunday activities.
He said the blue laws would all be repealed. Gambling laws would be repealed
or relaxed, so that gambling would be increased. He indicated then that
governments would get into gambling. We've had a lot of state lotteries pop
up around the country since then. And, at the time, we were already being
told that would be the case.
"Why should all that gambling money be kept in private hands when the State
would benefit from it?"
… was the rational behind it. But people should be able to gamble if they
want to. So it would become a civil activity, rather than a private, or
illegal activity. Bankruptcy laws would be changed. I don't remember the
details, but just that they would be changed. And I know subsequent to that
time they have been. Antitrust laws would be changed, or be interpreted
differently, or both. In connection with the changing anti-trust laws, there
was some statement that in a sense, competition would be increased. But this
would be increased competition within otherwise controlled circumstances. So
it's not a free competition. I recall of having the impression that it was
like competition but within members of a club. There would be nobody outside
the club would be able to compete. Sort of like teams competing within a
professional league ... if you're the NFL or the American or National
Baseball Leagues, you compete within the league but the league is all in
agreement on what the rules of competition are -not a really free
competition.
Encouragement of Drug Abuse to create a Jungle Atmosphere
Drug use would be increased. Alcohol use would be increased. Law enforcement
efforts against drugs would be increased. On first hearing that, it sounded
like a contradiction. Why increase drug abuse and simultaneously increase
law enforcement against drug abuse? But the idea is that, in part, the
increased availability of drugs would provide a sort of law of the jungle
whereby the weak and the unfit would be selected out. There was a statement
made at the time:
"Before the earth was overpopulated, there was a law of the jungle where
only the fittest survived."
You had to be able to protect yourself against the elements and wild animals
and disease. And if you were fit, you survived. But now we've become so
civilised -we're over civilized- and the unfit are enabled to survive, only
at the expense of those who are more fit. And the abusive drugs then, would
restore, in a certain sense, the law of the jungle, and selection of the
fittest for survival. News about drug abuse and law enforcement efforts
would tend to keep drugs in the public consciousness. And would also tend to
reduce this unwarranted American complacency that the world is a safe place,
and a nice place.
Alcohol Abuse
The same thing would happen with alcohol. Alcohol abuse would be both
promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and the weak would
respond to the promotions and, therefore, use and abuse more alcohol. Drunk
driving would become more of a problem; and stricter rules about driving
under the influence would be established so that more and more people would
lose their privilege to drive.
Restrictions on Travel
This also had connection with something we'll get to later about overall
restrictions on travel. Not everybody should be free to travel the way they
do now in the United States. People don't have a need to travel that way.
It's a privilege! It was a kind of a high-handed way it was put. Again, much
more in the way of psychological services would be made available to help
those who got hooked on drugs and alcohol. The idea being, that in order to
promote this -drug and alcohol abuse to screen out some of the unfit people
who are otherwise pretty good- would also be subject to getting hooked. And
if they were really worth their salt they would have enough sense to seek
psychological counseling and to benefit from it. So this was presented as
sort of a redeeming value on the part of the planners. It was as if he were
saying:
"... you think we're bad in promoting these evil things -but look how nice
we are- we're also providing a way out!"
The Need for More Jails, and Using Hospitals as Jails
More jails would be needed. Hospitals could serve as jails. Some new
hospital construction would be designed so as to make them adaptable to
jail-like use.
Tape 2
www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html
|
°über-wachung 